Sophie's Place

Welcome to my little place! You'll find here mainly BBC's Sherlock and Cabin Pressure and many, many fandoms more. And everything about books. Can be nsfw.
Also, my askbox is always open, whether it is a request for fanart or if you just need someone to talk to.
Posts I Feed On
Who I Adore

THAT CHEEKY EYEBROW RAISE.

(via superhyperharrypotterobsessive)

richardcfarmitage:

Richard Armitage’s flawless portrayal of John Proctor will stay with you for a lifetime. His version of the deeply troubled anti-hero may well rocket John Proctor into your mind as one of the greatest on-stage characters of modern times.”

"Armitage erupts with guilt, pride, regret and courage; the struggles of his psyche brought dazzlingly to life through the murky grey light of a beautifully stark, dark and barren set. His ultimate end is hard to watch, with the rawness of his inner turmoil painfully palpable."

The Londonist - July 2014

(via bifurs)

watershiphobbits:

If you are a man who thinks it’s funny to make misogynist jokes purely to make your female friends uncomfortable/angry, then you are a misogynist.  It is not “just a joke.”  You literally are finding humor in the discomfort and dehumanization of women.  You are not helping, you are not making satire.  You are just being misogynist.

(via worthyourweightinfanfiction)

hotdadthranduil:

lotr: places [1/?]

LOTHLÓRIEN

"There are no trees like the trees of that land. For in the autumn their leaves fall not, but turn to gold. Not till the spring and the new green opens do they fall, and then the boughs are laden with yellow flowers; and the floor of the wood is golden, and golden is the roof, and its pillars are of silver, for the bark of the trees is smooth and grey."

(via lockbearer)

moonager:

One time I was on a rollercoaster and a guy’s hat fell off during one of the loops but he caught it when we were right side up again, and i have to go my whole life knowing I’ll never be as cool as that guy.

(via superhyperharrypotterobsessive)

comealongpondd:

I DID NOT REALISE LEE WAS SO TALL?

LIKE COMPARED TO CUMBERBATCH WHAT

(via lockbearer)

bbcatemysoul:

sherlock holmes and john watson are beloved, iconic characters whose relationship (written in a time when it could not have been openly queer) was so intimate that the possible queer subtext has been being discussed for decades, and yet the possibility of their romantic involvement has never been textually explored on screen up to this point because it either hasn’t been allowed or hasn’t been socially acceptable to do so

there are queer people who have stated that it would be important to them personally to see sherlock holmes and john watson finally allowed to be in a textually queer relationship on screen

there are queer people who have stated that it would be important to them personally to see a queer romance given the same kind of slow-build treatment that heterosexual romances are often given but which queer stories are often denied

there are queer people who have stated that it would be important to them personally for the show to upset the notion that any character who hasn’t stated their sexual orientation can be assumed to be heterosexual by default

for this to actually happen on television in a popular show with such iconic characters would in fact be progressive and would in fact have a positive cultural impact and to pretend otherwise by accusing people who want it of fetishizing, of pretending that shipping is activism, or of not being queer enough is frankly repulsive

if it doesn’t mean anything to you, fine, but don’t sit there telling other people that the representation that they want isn’t valid because it didn’t get your own personal queer stamp of approval

oh, but i guess i don’t know why you’d listen to me; i’m just a bisexual woman who married a person of a different gender so i probably don’t count as being a “real” queer person

(via taikova)





THE GUY BEING A SPIDER IN THE BACK THOUGH


This is at least the third time I’ve reblogged this and I’m not sorry


THE GUY BEING A SPIDER IN THE BACK THOUGH

This is at least the third time I’ve reblogged this and I’m not sorry

(via superhyperharrypotterobsessive)

butfili:

THE TEASER TRAILER COMES OUT TOMORROW!!!

(via bilbo-greene)

sakibatch:

Benedict talking about motion capture in the ‘The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies’ for yahoo (x)

MOTION CAPTUREEEE

(via sherlockspeare)

celesgami:

OKAY NO

EVERYONE TAKE THIS FUCKING QUIZ RIGHT NOW

IM LITERALLY ANGRY ABOUT HOW ACCURATE IT IS FUCK THIS THING ALL I DID WAS CLICK ON COLORS ??? HO W DOES I TKNOW FRICK

(via bewitchi)

tillthenexttimedoctor:

cifera:

i am all for headcanon but i really think a lot of people don’t understand what the actual meaning of headcanon is.

headcanon is not ‘i don’t like this part of canon. in my opinion it should be different so i’m just going to replace it with what I think it should be’.

headcanon is ‘canon has never specified/is ambiguous about this specific thing, so i’m going to fill in the gap with my own reasonable guesses’.

A headcanon also isn’t an interpretation based on textual analysis, quotes and clearly outlined evidence.

(via fandommember)